DEMOGRAPHIC
AND ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES
Demographic changes between 1450 and 1750 were significant. Some major
population shifts included:
- A rise in the population of Europe
- Europe's population had been decimated by the
14th century plague epidemic, so during the 15th and 16th centuries population levels were growing to match
previous levels. Even though population pressure is not a good explanation
for the movement of Europeans across to the New World,
a long-term population expansion can be seen. For example, in 1000 C.E., Europe
had an estimated 36 million people. In 1700 the population had grown to
120 million, the largest percentage increase of any of the continents.
- A decrease in the population
of the Americas
- This trend may run counter to common knowledge, but it does reflect the
decimation of Amerindian populations by their encounters with Europeans.
For example, in the late 15th century North America
had almost 4 million people, Mexico
had more than 21 million, the Caribbean and Central
America each had almost 6 million, and South
America (Andes and Lowlands)
had almost 30 million. By 1700 the entire western hemisphere had only 13
million, a decrease from 67 million or so in 1500. Even though Europeans
had settled in both North and South America by
1700, their numbers were too few to make an overall demographic
difference.
- No overall population
decrease occurred in Africa - Again, counter to
common belief, the slave trade did not decimate the populations of Africa.
By 1700 Africa had more than 60 million people,
almost doubling their population in 1000. To be sure, some areas of Africa
did reflect huge population losses, and logically those were places where
the slave trade was most vigorous. Because the Atlantic trade was so much
larger than the Saharan trade, areas most affected were along Africa's
west coast, such as the Gold Coast and Slave Coast
to the north, the Bight of Biafra in the middle, and Angola
in the south.
Between 1000 and 1700 C.E., the populations of Asia -
including the Middle East, Indian, and East
Asia - more than doubled to a total of about 415 million. Clearly,
overall world population grew, and the majority of people by the end of the
time period still lived in the Middle East and Asia.*
The Columbian Exchange almost certainly caused some environmental changes
that help to explain the population trends listed above. For example, maize and
cassava (a nutritious plant used in modern day in tapioca) were transported by
Portuguese ships from Brazil
to Angola in
southwest Africa. Angolans cultivated the crops, which
adapted very well to their land. Some historians believe that this exchange
provided the base for the population increase that followed, despite the fact
that many Angolans were captured and deported to the New World
as slaves. Likewise, the Andean potato eventually became the staple for poor
people in Europe, sustaining population growth despite
the number of people that began to migrate to the New World.
Major environmental changes occurred in the New World
in two major ways:
- Soil exhaustion - Plantations
in the Americas tended to rely on single crops, a process that depletes
the soil of nutrients, and since land was plentiful, often the planters
just moved on to clear more land. For example, in the Caribbean,
instead of rotating sugar with other crops, planters found it more
profitable to clearly new lands when yields began to decline. Eventually,
they moved on to other islands.
- Deforestation - The Spanish
first cut down forests in the Caribbean to make
pastures for the cattle they brought, and deforestation accelerated when
more areas were cleared for plantations. In North America,
shipbuilding in the northern English colonies took its toll of forests. In
all of the Americas,
the forests near the coasts were the first to go, so that deforestation
was significant in many areas by 1750.
Deforestation was also taking place in Europe during
this period. Timber was needed for ships, buildings, wagons, barrels, and many
other items. Wood shortages were made worse by the Little Ice Age that began in
Europe during the 1590s. People burned wood to keep
warm, and by the mid-17th century, forests were growing scarce and wood prices
skyrocketed. This wood shortage encouraged the use of coal for fuel, and since England
had coal in great supply, deforestation almost certainly helped their economy
grow. However, deforestation had many negative effects, especially on the poor.
The Little Ice Age spread as far as China,
where it caused hardship that led people to rebellion and discontent, a
condition that contributed to the mid-17th century demise of Ming China.